Amber Heard Says Insurance Dispute ‘Prejudicial’ to Appeal

Actress Amber Read pictured inside of the Fairfax County Circuit Courthouse in Fairfax, Virginia, on June 1, 2022.

Amber Heard’s attorneys are making an attempt to halt depositions in a civil dispute involving two insurance policies firms battling about their monetary legal responsibility for the $10 million she owes Johnny Depp.

A new submitting on Monday states Heard’s legal professionals really don’t want the scenario to move forward when she’s desirable the $10 million verdict that a jury in June requested her to fork out Depp for defamation, saying “the continued prosecution of these steps is prejudicial to Ms. Heard’s protection.” Promises involving the New York Maritime and General Insurance Co.’s obligation to indemnify a judgment “are not ripe unless of course and until finally there is a closing judgment in the Depp lawsuit,” the submitting said.

The lawyers, who include things like Kayla Robinson of Pasich LLP in Los Angeles, say Heard was not living in the United States when New York Maritime sued her, and she nonetheless is not, “therefore, this court docket lacks jurisdiction.”

Heard’s new legal professionals explained they “may shift for a protective order” to thwart depositions that New York Maritime legal professionals want to perform with the attorneys who represented Listened to in Depp’s lawsuit and her countersuit. They also want a hearing scheduled for Nov. 3 to be rescheduled to Dec. 1, “or yet another day handy for the court.”

U.S. District Decide George H. Wu in Los Angeles appeared to reiterate the Nov. 3 hearing by notifying counsel they can seem for it by telephone, but he later on rescheduled it to Nov. 21 just after granting Heard’s ask for for more time to respond to the criticism.

New York Maritime lawyers, meanwhile, are questioning irrespective of whether Read really wasn’t a United States resident when they sued her, stating they’ve been given no proof exhibiting so. They also never want their scheduled depositions to be delayed, expressing Heard’s lawyers didn’t point out the jurisdictional dilemma they are now elevating when the depositions were scheduled.

“Accordingly, New York Maritime thinks it is correct for the depositions scheduled in mid-November to move forward as at this time scheduled,” according to a scheduling report submitted Monday by legal professionals for Listened to, New York Maritime and Travelers Business Insurance plan Co.

Attorneys for Travelers never oppose Heard’s continue to be ask for, but New York Marine legal professionals want to continue with only their claims relating to the company’s obligation to protect Read, stating it is high-quality to do so simply because of the current judgment. That is for the reason that New York Maritime is searching for a courtroom get declaring that it does not have to shell out Heard’s judgment, which will be relevant “if the judgment is affirmed or in any other case not disturbed on charm.”

The to start with lawsuit was initiated by Tourists versus New York Marine, which is element of ProSight Specialty Team. Equally are insurers who represented Heard, and Tourists is accusing New York Maritime of hoping to shirk its duty to “reimburse Vacationers for fifty percent of the attorney’s charges, costs, and charges of defending their mutual insured” in the Depp situation, “which left Vacationers bearing an inequitable part of the protection.”

New York Maritime has submitted a counterclaim that argues it does not owe Travelers anything simply because the attorney New York Marine wanted Heard to use for the case, Cameron McEvoy, stopped representing her in November 2020 and was not concerned in the demo. New York Marine’s criticism suggests the attorneys retained by Heard and funded by Travelers “refused to cooperate with Cameron McEvoy and intentionally obstructed and prevented Cameron McEvoy’s lively involvement in the protection of the insured.”

In the second lawsuit, New York Maritime is suing Heard, searching for a court docket buy that it isn’t obligated to spend for her defense.

Lawyers for Travelers identified as New York Marine’s allegation “provocative” and its idea “aggressive” when inquiring Wu to consolidate the circumstances, warning that the lawful issue in each situations “will be point intensive and ProSight has scheduled the Court docket to test it twice.”

A 2007 George W. Bush appointee, Wu agreed to consolidated the situations for pre-demo reasons on Oct. 20.

Browse the total joint scheduling report listed here.

[Image: Photo by Evelyn Hockstein/Pool/AFP via Getty Images]

Have a suggestion we really should know? [email protected]